|
Beginning in the middle of the eighteenth
century, when the foundations of British rule were effectively
laid, the British government showed increasing interest in the
welfare of the people of India, feeling the need to curb the
greed, recklessness, and corrupt activities of the private
British East India Company. Beginning in 1773, the British
Parliament sought to regulate the company's administration. By
1784 the company was made responsible to Parliament for its
civil and military affairs and was transformed into an
instrument of British foreign policy.
Some new measures introduced in the spirit
of government intervention clearly did not benefit the people
of Bengal. The Permanent Settlement (Landlease Act) of Lord
Charles Cornwallis in 1793, which regulated the activities of
the British agents and imposed a system of revenue collection
and landownership, stands as a monument to the disastrous
effects of the good intentions of Parliament. The traditional
system for collecting land taxes involved the zamindars, who
exercised the dual function of revenue collectors and local
magistrates. The British gave the zamindars the status and
rights of landlords, modeled mainly on the British landed
gentry and aristocracy. Under the new system the
revenue-collecting rights were often auctioned to the highest
bidders, whether or not they had any knowledge of rural
conditions or the managerial skills necessary to improve
agriculture. Agriculture became a matter of speculation among
urban financiers, and the traditional personal link between
the resident zamindars and the peasants was broken. Absentee
landlordship became commonplace, and agricultural development
stagnated.
Most British subjects who had served with
the British East India Company until the end of the eighteenth
century were content with making profits and leaving the
Indian social institutions untouched. A growing number of
Anglican and Baptist evangelicals in Britain, however, felt
that social institutions should be reformed. There was also
the demand in Britain, first articulated by member of
Parliament and political theorist Edmund Burke, that the
company's government balance its exploitative practices with
concern for the welfare of the Indian people. The influential
utilitarian theories of Jeremy Bentham and James Mill stated
that societies could be reformed by proper laws. Influenced in
part by these factors, British administrators in India
embarked on a series of social and administrative reforms that
were not well received by the conservative elements of Bengali
society. Emphasis was placed on the introduction of Western
philosophy, technology, and institutions rather than on the
reconstruction of native institutions. The early attempts by
the British East India Company to encourage the use of
Sanskrit and Persian were abandoned in favor of Western
science and literature; elementary education was taught in the
vernacular, but higher education in English. The stated
purpose of secular education was to produce a class of Indians
instilled with British cultural values. Persian was replaced
with English as the official language of the government. A
code of civil and criminal procedure was fashioned after
British legal formulas. In the field of social reforms, the
British suppressed what they considered to be inhumane
practices, such as suttee (self-immolation of widows on the
funeral pyres of their husbands), female infanticide, and
human sacrifice.
British policy viewed colonies as suppliers
of raw materials and purchasers of manufactured goods. The
British conquest of India coincided with the Industrial
Revolution in Britain, led by the mechanization of the textile
industry. As a result of the British policy of dumping
machine-made goods in the subcontinent, India's domestic craft
industries were thoroughly ruined, and its trade and commerce
collapsed. Eastern Bengal was particularly hard hit. Muslin
cloth from Dhaka had become popular in eighteenth-century
Europe until British muslin drove it off the market.
|